Fouling Impact – Economical

Economic Impact of Fouling in Heat Exchangers

Decision-making process on fouling can be driven by the need to solve an acute and recurring problem in the production. A heat exchanger or condenser subject to excessive fouling with the need to be serviced (manually cleaned) in between scheduled turnaround moments will obviously benefit from on-line cleaning and the economic advantages are not likely to be challenged.

Benefit from adding Eqobrush to existing systems

Heat Exchangers that do not need extra servicing between scheduled maintenance moments may not be considered to benefit from a brushing system and therefore an investment proposal for a brushing system may be more difficult to get approved.  For us it is difficult to demonstrate the payback period on an Eqobrush system for an existing Heat Exchanger in operation. From client’s engineering point of view, however, this may be relatively simple by just comparing the heat exchanger data from different stages of the cycle, just after full manual cleaning until just before cleaning. Good indicators are:

  • Pressure drop (pump energy over the tube side of heat exchanger)
  • Power consumption (for chillers)
  • Efficiency of heat exchanging process
  • Overall output of power plants (condensers)
  • Possible extension of life time of the equipment

A viable practical approach for industrial users can be found in analyzing the scheduling of factory maintenance. Could the period between 2 maintenance period be extended by fitting critical Heat Exchangers with Eqobrush? Are there heat exchangers that require intermediate servicing?

With data as indicated above available, economical advantages can be consistently demonstrated on individual levels.

General industry data on the economic impact of fouling:

  • 8% of industry maintenance budget
  • 0.25% of western countries GDP; 0.20% of Chinese GDP
  • 20% increase in fuel cost for fossil fuel powered systems

Benefit from adding Eqobrush to new systems

For new systems the question whether or not to add Eqobrush can be simply answered by comparing the (pre)selected heat exchanger to a “non-fouling” system. Overdesign of practical systems to compensate for the fouling impact start from typically 30% more heat exchange surface. The impact on the total CAPEX of the installation (including additional investment in civil works) range from an additional 25% to a multitude of a non-fouling design.

In many cases the CAPEX of an Eqobrush-equipped, non-fouling design, system will be comparable or lower than a traditional design, thus clarifying the issue of pay-back straight away: the system paid for itself before installation.

The benefits as mentioned above applying to existing systems also apply to new systems, which means additional cost savings throughout the operational life of the installation.